ENRIQUEZ
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jose G. Enriquez appealed the Social Security Administration's denial of his claim for period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and affirmed the Commissioner's decision to deny the benefits.
The court affirmed the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's claim. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's well-reasoned report and recommendation and found no basis to overturn the administrative decision.
Plaintiff Jose G. Enriquez filed a claim for period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income with the Social Sec…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation Adoption cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of Sean P. Flynn, United States Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 18). Judge Flynn recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Plaintiff's claim for period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. No objections to the report and recommendation were filed, and the time to object has expired.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews
the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F. 2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982).
After careful consideration of the record, including Judge Sansone's wellreasoned report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Consequently, the Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
1. Judge Flynn's report and recommendation (Doc. 18) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.
2. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED.
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 9th day of February, 2024
Pul.Bh
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)