GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.
v.
LAROCCA, D.C.

M.D. Fla. | 2024-10-25
No. 8:24-cv-2452
2024 FFL 27017 District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A magistrate judge recused himself sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) due to a financial interest in one of the parties. The case was reassigned to another magistrate judge by random draw.


Holding

The magistrate judge determined that recusal was warranted due to a financial interest in one of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and ordered the case reassigned to another magistrate judge.


Key Quotes

“Under 28 U.S.C. § 455, a judge must disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

Establishes the legal standard for judicial recusal

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

This case involves Government Employees Insurance Co. (GEICO) as plaintiff and Michael T. LaRocca and other defendants. The magistrate judge identifie…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This cause is before the Court sua sponte. Under 28 U.S.C. § 455, a judge must disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. See 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). And if the proper grounds do exist, a judge has an affirmative and self-enforcing obligation to recuse himself on his own accord. See United States v. Kelly, 888 F. 2d 732, 744 (11th Cir. 1989).

After careful review, the undersigned has determined that his recusal is warranted due to a financial interest in one of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to another magistrate judge by random draw and to provide notice to the parties of the newly designated magistrate judge.

SO ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 25th day of October 2024.

Christopher P. di HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER P. TUITE United States Magistrate Judge

Copies to: Counsel of record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw