RICHARDSON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this Social Security disability benefits appeal, the district court granted the Commissioner's unopposed motion to remand the case for further administrative proceedings under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four, because the court could not discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision.
The court granted the unopposed remand motion because it could not discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision, and remand is appropriate under sentence four to allow the ALJ to explain the basis for the determination on a complete record including any new material evidence.
[1] A court may reverse or remand a Commissioner of Social Security decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. …
[2] A sentence-four remand is appropriate when the court cannot discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Where the court cannot discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision, a sentence-four remand may be appropriate to allow him to explain the basis for his decision.”
Establishes the legal standard for when remand under sentence four is appropriate
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRichardson filed for Social Security disability benefits. The case proceeded through administrative review, and the Commissioner issued a decision. Th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentence Four Remand cases and more on FLexlaw
The Commissioner has filed an unopposed motion to remand this case for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 26). Upon review, the Court agrees with the parties that it is appropriate to remand this matter to the Commissioner. Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g) the Court is empowered to reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993). Where the court cannot discern the basis for the Commissioner's decision, a sentence-four remand may be appropriate to allow him to explain the basis for his decision. Falcon v. Heckler, 732 F. 2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding remand was appropriate to allow the ALJ to explain the basis for the determination that the claimant's depression did not significantly affect her ability to work). On remand under sentence four, the ALJ should review the case on a complete record, including any new material evidence. Diorio v. Heckler, 721 F. 2d 726, 729 (11th Cir. 1983) (finding that it was necessary for the ALJ on remand to consider psychiatric report tendered
to Appeals Council); Reeves v. Heckler, 734 F. 2d 519, 522 n. 1 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding that the ALJ should consider on remand the need for an orthopedic evaluation).
Accordingly, the Commissioner's unopposed motion for entry of judgment with remand (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. This action is REVERSED AND REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).¹ Upon remand, the Commissioner will: (1) offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing; (2) if warranted, obtain supplemental vocational evidence; (3) take any further action needed to complete the administrative record; and (4) issue a new decision. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on October 28, 2024.
PHILIP R. LAMMENS
United States Magistrate Judge
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1993)
- Dirven D. Reeves v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 519 (11th Cir. 1984)
- Diorio v. Heckler, 721 F.2d 726 (11th Cir. 1983)
- Falcon v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 827 (11th Cir. 1984)