ANDERSON, JR.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act because the Commissioner did not oppose the motion and the statutory requirements were met.
Plaintiff Walter L. Anderson, Jr. moved for attorney's fees and costs under the EAJA after the Commissioner's final decision was remanded. The Commiss…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substantially Justified Position cases and more on FLexlaw
Walter L. Anderson, Jr. moves for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. Section 2412. (Doc. 26). The Commissioner opposes Mr. Anderson’s motion, but the Commissioner did not respond to Mr. Anderson’s motion and the time to do so has expired. (Doc. 26, p. 21); See Local Rule 3.01(c), M.D. Fla.1 Mr. Anderson requests $16,310.16 in attorney’s fees. (Id. at 1). The EAJA permits awards for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing party against the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2412. A January 10, 2023 order
remanded the Commissioner’s final decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 24). The Clerk
entered judgment in Mr. Anderson’s favor. (Doc. 25). In failing to respond to Mr. Anderson’s motion, the Commissioner does not contest the following: Mr. Anderson is the prevailing party; Mr. Anderson’s net worth was less than $2 million when he filed his complaint; the
Commissioner’s position was not substantially justified; and Mr. Anderson’s attorney’s fees request are reasonable. (Doc. 26, pp. 1–2, 9–10). A court should grant a Social Security claimant’s request for attorney’s fees when it is unopposed. See Jones v. Colvin, No. 8:13-CV-2900-T-33AEP, 2015 WL 7721334
(M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2015) (awarding unopposed attorney’s fees request). Thus, Mr. Anderson is entitled to $16,310.16 in attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees awarded to a claimant under the EAJA can be offset to satisfy the claimant’s pre-existing debt to the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010). Following an order, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Mr. Anderson owes a debt to the United States. Mr. Anderson assigned his rights to EAJA fees to his attorney. (Doc. 26, Ex. 1). So, if Mr. Anderson has no federal debt, the United States will accept
his assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to counsel.
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that Mr. Anderson’s motion for attorney’s fees under the EAJA (Doc. 26) be GRANTED. Mr. Anderson should be awarded $16,310.16 in attorney’s fees. ENTERED in Tampa, Florida on March1, 2023.
Aranda. Are he Sarma.
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE
United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE TO PARTIES
The parties have fourteen days from the date they are served a copy of this report to file written objections to this report’s proposed findings and recommendations or to seek an extension of the fourteen-day deadline to file written objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 3-1. A party’s failure to object timely in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives that party’s right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order adopting this report’s unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions. 11th Cir. R. 3-1.