IMFELD
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2024-12-19
No. 8:23-cv-1071
2024 FFL 31023 District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the plaintiff's unopposed petition for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.


Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff sought attorney's fees under the EAJA, requesting a higher hourly rate than statutorily specified due to cost of living increases. The d…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 25; collectively, “Petition”), filed November 25, 2024. In the Petition, Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $9,215.01. Petition at 1. [fn 2] Plaintiff represents that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. Id. at 4.

Plaintiff's counsel expended a total of 37.6 hours in the representation of Plaintiff before the Court: 6.6 hours by Carol Avard, 28.7 hours by Craig Polhemus, and 2.3 hours for the preparation of the Petition. Id. at 3; see also Affidavit (Doc. No. 25-1) at 18-19 (Schedule of Hours). Plaintiff requests an hourly rate of $244.62 for hours expended in 2023 and $251.54 for hours expended in 2024. Petition at 3; Affidavit (Doc. No. 25-1) at 19. Plaintiff is seeking a higher hourly rate than the $125 specified by statute based on the increase in the cost of living since 1996, when the attorney's fee rate was last adjusted by Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) (permitting fee awards at rates higher than $125 per hour upon the Court's determination that cost of living has increased). Having examined the Consumer Price Index and the representations made in the Petition, the Court concludes an increase in inflation does justify a proportionate increase in attorney's fees. [fn 3]

Plaintiff has assigned her rights to any entitlement of attorney's fees due under the EAJA to her counsel. Petition at 3; see Attorney Fee Contract for Social Security Benefits/SSI Fee Agreement-Federal Court (Doc. No. 25-2).

Regarding the assignment, Plaintiff represents the following:

[After the Court issues an] Order awarding EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's Assignment of EAJA fees and pay fees directly to Plaintiffs counsel.

Petition at 3.

In light of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Unopposed Petition for EAJA Fees Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 25) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for attorney's fees in the amount of $9,215.01 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

3. The Commissioner may exercise her discretion to honor Plaintiffs assignment of fees to counsel if the U.S. Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the U.S. Government.

DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on December 19, 2024.

James R. Klindt

JAMES R. KLINDT

United States Magistrate Judge

kaw Copies: Counsel of Record

[fn 1]: Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on November 30, 2024. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin is substituted for Martin O'Malley as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

[fn 2]: The pagination of the Petition is not continuous. Citations to the Petition follow the pagination of the Court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF).

[fn 3]: See U.S. Dep't of Labor, Inflation Calculator, at http://data.bls.gov/cgibin/cpicalc.pl (last visited December 19, 2024). In computing the hourly rate adjustment for the cost of living increase, the Consumer Price Indexes generally used for the year in which the services were performed. See Masonry Masters, Inc. v. Nelson, 105F. 3d708, 710-13(D.C. Cir. 1997); see also Gates v. Barnhart, No. 5:01-cv-148-Oc-GRJ, 2002 WL 1452232, at *3 (M.D. Fla. June 25, 2002) (unpublished).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw