ROUSSIN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

M.D. Fla. | 2024-12-30
No. 2:23-cv-1089
2024 FFL 31731 District Court, M.D. Florida (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Denise Ann Roussin's attorney sought attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a successful Social Security benefits award. The court granted the request for $45,221.93 in fees, representing 25 percent of past-due benefits, with the prior EAJA award to be returned to the plaintiff.


Holding

The requested fee of $45,221.93 under § 406(b) is reasonable and appropriate. The prior EAJA award of $16,641.07 will be returned to the plaintiff by the attorney.


Key Quotes

“Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee—not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits—for work performed before the court.”

Establishes the statutory framework and cap for attorney's fees in Social Security cases

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Denise Ann Roussin obtained an award of Social Security benefits. Her attorney, Carol Avard, filed a motion for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Having obtained an award of benefits, Denise Ann Roussin's attorney, Carol Avard, seeks attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 23.) Defendant has not opposed the request.

Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee—not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits—for work performed before the court. Here, Avard requests $45,221.93, which is 25 percent of past-due benefits. (Doc. 23 at 1-2.) Avard further asserts that the previous EAJA award of $16,641.07 will be returned to Plaintiff. (Doc. 23 at 2-3); see Paltan v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 519 F. App'x 673, 674 (11th Cir. 2013) (noting that the attorney has the option of either refunding a prior EAJA award to the plaintiff directly or reducing the § 406(b) award by the same amount). For the reasons stated in Roussin's motion, the requested fee is both reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b).

Accordingly, the fee motion (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. The clerk will enter judgment for Roussin for $45,221.93 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on December 30, 2024.

Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Copies: All Parties of Record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw