H.V.R. PARTS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
QUERAMBEL CAMILE, APPELLEE
H.V.R. PARTS, INC., APPELLANT,
QUERAMBEL CAMILE, APPELLEE
528 So. 2d 142
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and motion to quash service of process. We affirm on the authority of Law Offices of Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The affidavit submitted by appellant in support of its motion to dismiss fails to rebut the allegation in appel-lee’s complaint regarding sale and delivery in Florida of the machine that injured appellee.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McDONALD v. State, 537 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…trial court is directed to correct the written judgment and sentence to reflect 281 days credit for time served, rather than the 213 days set forth on the sentencing documents. See Fitch v. State, 533 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Lewis v. State, 528 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Accordingly, we affirm as to the first two issues, and reverse and remand as to the third issue, with directions to correct the written sentence to conform the credit for time served to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. WI…
-
Fitch v. State, 533 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…ed on probation for a period of 5 years. The written sentence is reversed and the case remanded for correction of that sentence to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement. Bivins v. State, 454 So. 2d [*328] 723 (Fia. 1st DCA 1984); Lewis v. State, 528 So. 2d 142 (Fia. 1st DCA 1988). We also reverse the imposition of costs under Sections 27.3455, 960.20 and 943.-25(4), Florida Statutes (1987), and remand for further proceedings at which the defendant shall be given notice and an opportunity to be heard. Je…
-
Anechiarico v. State, 546 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…ders under review, they are hereby reversed, set aside and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing as to Counts I and IV which relate to burglary and battery. See Fitch v. State, 533 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Lewis v. State, 528 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).…
Authorities Cited
- LAW Offs. OF Evan I. Fetterman v. Inter-Tel Inc., 480 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)