BROWN
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, overruling the plaintiff's objections and dismissing the amended complaint.
Plaintiff filed a pro se amended complaint which the Magistrate Judge recommended be dismissed for failing to satisfy pleading requirements and statin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Cognizable Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
Case No: 8:25-cv-854-WFJ-TGW
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's report recommending that Plaintiff Laval Brown's pro se amended complaint (Dkt. 5) be dismissed and stricken from the record. Dkt. 9. In response, Plaintiff filed objections. Dkt. 12.
When a party makes timely and specific objections to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the district judge shall conduct a de novo review of the portions of the record to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Jeffrey S. State Bd. of Educ. of State of Ga., 896 F. 2d 507, 512 (11th Cir. 1990). After such independent review, the Court may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Macort v. Prem., Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 783-84 (11th Cir. 2006) (citing published opinion).
The Magistrate Judge, in a thorough and well-reasoned analysis, found that the amended complaint (Dkt. 5) fails to satisfy basic pleading requirements in its factual or legal allegations and to state a cognizable claim. Dkt. 9. It contains false, scurrilous, and impertinent matter and mocks the State Attorney's Office. Id. at 3. Having conducted a de novo and independent review of the file, and for the sound reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation, the Court rules as follows:
1. Plaintiff's objections (Dkt. 12) are overruled. 2. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 9) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and made a part of this order. record. 3. Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. 5) is dismissed and stricken from the 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and to close the case.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on June 18, 2025.
s/William F. Jung WILLIAM F. JUNG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Plaintiff, pro se
- 2 -
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jeffrey S. v. State Bd. OF Educ. OF State OF Ga., 896 F.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990)