GOODWIN
v.
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
to dismiss an action without a court order by filing “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i0). But the Stipulation (Doc. 69) is signed only by Plaintiff and Defendant United Airlines, Inc. rather than “by all parties who have appeared” as required by Rule 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). See Hardnett v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, No. 21-18195, 2023 WL 2056285 (11th Cir. 2023); see also City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hosp. Holdings, L.P., 82 F. 4th 1031 (11th Cir. 2023). Thus, the Stipulation is not effective to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against United Airlines, Inc. All claims in this case remain pending. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florid June 24 5. Ce
HN ANTOON II
United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hospitality Holdings, L.P., 82 F.4th 1031 (11th Cir. 2023)
- Patrick v. Atl. Animal Health, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2025)