MORETTO
v.
CENTURION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A prisoner who has had three or more prior lawsuits dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim cannot proceed in forma pauperis unless alleging imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Plaintiff, a prisoner, moved to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil rights action. The court identified four prior federal lawsuits filed by the plai…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Imminent Danger Of Serious Physical Injury Exception cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court is Plaintiff Stephen Moretto's Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Doc. 1). Moretto—a prisoner of the Florida Department of Corrections—moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2). Because Moretto is barred from doing so under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.
Under § 1915(g), a prisoner cannot proceed in forma pauperis if “on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, [he] brought an action or appeal in a [federal] court...that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted[.]"28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Lomax v. Ortiz-Martinez, 140 S. Ct. 1721, 1723 (2020) (“To help staunch a 'flood of nonmeritorious' prisoner
litigation, the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995 established what has become known as the three-strikes rule.” (citation omitted)). Dismissals for abuse of the judicial process may also qualify as strikes. Allen v. Clark, 266 F. App'x 815, 816 (11th Cir. 2008).
The Court takes judicial notice of four prior federal lawsuits Moretto filed in this district, all of which were filed before this case and qualify as strikes: Case Nos. (1) 2:21-cv-779-JLB-KCD (frivolous and malicious); (2) 2:23- cv-755-JES-NPM (failure to state a claim); (3) 2:23-cv-880-JES-KCD (abuse of the judicial process); and (4) 2:23-cv-881-SPC-NPM (failure to state a claim). Moretto is not exempt from § 1915(g)'s three-strikes rule, as the complaint does not allege he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Mitchell v. Nobles, 873 F. 3d 869, 872 (11th Cir. 2017).
The Court thus dismisses the complaint without prejudice. If Moretto wishes to pursue his claims, he must file a new complaint—under a new case number and pay the filing fee.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff Stephen Moretto's Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close this case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 6, 2025.
Sheri Polster Rappell
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SA: FTMP-1
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Mitchell v. Warden, Nobles, Warden Care and Treatment, Mark G. Woods, Medical Director, J. Hendricks, 873 F.3d 869 (11th Cir. 2017)