CALLIE HALL HOLTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
S. J. PATTERSON AND HER HUSBAND, N. J. PATTERSON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
CALLIE HALL HOLTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
S. J. PATTERSON AND HER HUSBAND, N. J. PATTERSON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
49 Fla. 178
Florida Supreme Court (1905)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
In this cause the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Shackleford and Mi*. Justice Carter are of opinion that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice IIocker and Mr. Justice Cockrell are of opinion that it should be reversed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. ..... 37 South. Rep. 51, and Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. .... 37 South. Rep. 742, an order will be entered affirming the judgment from which the writ of error was taken.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mugge v. Tate, 51 Fla. 255 (Fla. 1906)…that the judgment should be affirmed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of the State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla, 224, [*256] 37 South. Rep. 51; Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. 250, 37 South. Rep. 742, and Holton v. Patterson, 49 Fla. 178, 38 South. Rep. 352, a judgment will be entered in each of the above styled cause affirming the judgments to which the writs of error were taken. It is so ordered.…
-
Randall v. L'Engle, 52 Fla. 594 (Fla. 1906)…opinion that the decree should be affirmed. Under these [*595] circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rept. 51; Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. 250, 37 South. Rept. 742; Holton v. Patterson, 49 Fla. 178, 38 South. Rep. 352, and Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co., 51 Fla. 255, 41 South. Rep. 603, an order will be entered affirming the decree. It is so ordered.…