ALLAN JACOB AND SANDRA JACOB
v.
YISRAEL TAUSSIG, MALKA SINGER TAUSSIG, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the motion for default judgment.
[1] When no timely objection is filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court may adopt the recommendation after reviewing the factual allegations…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiffs moved for default judgment against several defendants. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting the motion in part and denying it in part.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
The United States Magistrate Judge recommends granting in part and denying in part Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob's motion for default judgment against Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, Ruchama Taussig, ARLG, LLC, Herman & Sons LLC (H&S), Herman Taussig, and Aaron Taussig. (Docs. 34, 39). The deadline to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation has passed without any party lodging an objection. Considering the record, I adopt the Report and Recommendation.
After conducting a review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by a magistrate judge, the district court must
conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F. 2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper- Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commʼrs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
In the absence of any objection and after reviewing the factual allegations and legal conclusions, I adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes.
2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 34) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
3. The Clerk is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT as follows: a. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against Malka Singer Taussig on Count I of the Complaint. The transfer of property located at 16446 Little Garden Drive, Wimauma, FL 33598, from 46 Little Garden LLC to ARLG is void. b. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against Malka Singer Taussig on Count II of the Complaint. The transfer of
2
property located at 16313 Little Garden Drive, Wimauma, FL 33598, from 13 Little Garden, LLC to H&S is void. c. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against ARLG on Count III of the Complaint, and against Ruchama Taussig on Count IV of the Complaint. The transfer of property located at 16446 Little Garden Drive, Wimauma, FL 33598, from ARLG to H&S is void. d. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, Ruchama Taussig, ARLG, H&S, Herman Taussig, and Aaron Taussig on Count VI of the Complaint, with respect to property located at 16446 Little Garden and 16313 Little Garden, on which Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob have the right to level execution.
4. Count V of the Complaint is DISMISSED.
5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and TERMINATE any pending motions or deadlines.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on December 22, 2025.
Kathryn Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Durham Eldon Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir. 1992)
- In re Mad Toyz III, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2026)