JOHN CLARK, III AND MICHAEL R. WRIGHT
v.
SERGEANT RACHEL ROCK, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the complaint must be dismissed without prejudice because multiple prisoners cannot join claims in a single action and one plaintiff cannot represent another.
[1] Multiple prisoners may not join claims in a single federal lawsuit to avoid paying the full filing fee, as prohibited by the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
[2] A prisoner proceeding pro se cannot represent the legal interests of a fellow inmate in a federal lawsuit.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) prohibits multiple prisoners from avoiding payment of a filing fee by joining claims in a single case.”
Establishes that multiple prisoners cannot file jointly to circumvent individual filing fee requirements under the PLRA.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTwo incarcerated prisoners, John Clark, III, and Michael R. Wright, filed a single complaint pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging excessive force, …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Litigation Reform Act Of 1995 (Plra) cases and more on FLexlaw
Clark (Id. at 11). Plaintiffs' application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) likewise is signed solely by Plaintiff Clark and includes only his prison bank statement information. Plaintiffs allege that they were subjected to excessive force, false disciplinary action, and inadequate medical care.
Discussion
The complaint must be dismissed without prejudice. First, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) prohibits multiple prisoners from avoiding payment of a filing fee by joining claims in a single case. Hubbard v. Haley, 262 F. 3d
1
1194, 1198 (11th Cir. 2001). Thus, to comply with the PLRA, each prisoner must file a separate action in which he is responsible for the full filing fee. See id. (upholding district court's dismissal of lawsuit wherein the multiple-prisoner plaintiffs sought to proceed together in forma pauperis). Second, only Plaintiff Clark signed the complaint. He may not represent the interests of Plaintiff Wright, who is attempting to proceed in this action. See Massimo v. Henderson, 468 F. 2d 1209, 1210 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of the portion of a prisoner's complaint that sought relief on behalf of the prisoner's fellow inmates); Wallace v. Smith, 145 F. App'x 300, 302 (11th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (citing Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F. 2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975) (finding it "plain error to permit [an] imprisoned litigant who is unassisted by counsel to represent his fellow inmates in a class action") (alteration in original)).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each Plaintiff may re-file by individually filing his complaint in a new case with a new case number and either paying the full filing fee or submitting an individual motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a supporting financial affidavit if he cannot afford to pay the filing fee in its entirety.
2. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED as moot.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to (1) close this case and (2) send to both
2
Clark and Wright a civil rights complaint form and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis form with their copies of this Order.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on January 6, 2026.
JOHN L. BADALAMENTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F.2d 1405 (4th Cir. 1975)
- Matthew Massimo and on the behalf of F. L. (Frank) Jones v. The Warden, 468 F.2d 1209 (5th Cir. 1972)