FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT,

v.

FLAGSHIP BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, A FLORIDA BANKING ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cordova v. State, 855 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …] ing of subsection 921.161(2), Florida Statutes (2001), which requires the jailer to certify several postjudgment time periods, including any periods after sentence that the prisoner was at liberty on bond. Id. § 921.161(2)(b); see State v. Peters, 526 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).* In reality, “time spent” under subsection 921.161(2) refers back to a similar phrase used in subsection 921.161(1) and means time spent in custody. See id. § 921.161(1) (“time she or he spent in the county jañ”). The jailer is…
• Moening v. State, 643 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
  …nd while awaiting disposition of his appeal. Because CRD is not “coercive deprivation of liberty,” Moening is not entitled to receive credit for time he spent in this program. See Tal-Mason v. State, 515 So. 2d 738, 739 (Fla. 1987); State v. Peters, 526 So. 2d 747, 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). This case is remanded with directions that Moening be given credit for time served in jail and in custody of the DOC, excluding time spent on CRD. Upon resentencing, the combined disposition of incarceration and probation m…
• Kuhn v. State, 695 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …reject the appellant’s claim that he is entitled to credit against his prison sentence for time spent on community control. See Smith v. State, 615 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Mathews v. State, 529 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Peters, 526 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).…