HERBERT HENDERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1988-05-31
No. 87-2447
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
526 So. 2d 743 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant cannot be convicted and punished twice for a single act involving the misuse of a firearm, especially when the firearm is an essential element of both offenses.


Facts & Procedural History

Henderson was convicted of "Possession of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony" and "Second Degree Murder by Use of a Firearm" stemming from a sing…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Henderson was convicted of “Possession of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony,” section 790.07, Florida Statutes (1987), and “Second Degree Murder by Use of a Firearm,” sections 782.04(2) and 775.087, Florida Statutes (1987). Both of these convictions resulted from a single act by Henderson, i.e., the firing of a firearm at another individual.

Both convictions cannot stand. Faced with a similar question the fifth district held:

[A] defendant should not be convicted and punished, or his punishment enhanced, twice because of one misuse one time of a firearm. When the firearm is an essential enhancing element of the underlying offense ... the defendant should not also be convicted and punished under section 790.07(2), Florida Statutes, for that same misuse of the same firearm.

Burton v. State, 522 So. 2d 88, 89 n. 4 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Current views of the Supreme Court of Florida on double jeopardy support our holding. See Hall v. State, 517 So. 2d 678, 678 (Fla.1988) (defendant cannot be convicted of both “the offense of armed robbery under section 812.13(1) and (2)(a), Florida Statutes, and the offense of displaying a firearm or carrying a concealed firearm, under section 790.07(2), Florida Statutes, when the offenses resulted from a single act”); Carawan v. State, 515 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1987) (defendant cannot be charged with both attempted manslaughter and aggravated battery where both offenses are predicated on a single underlying act).

The motion for post-conviction relief is granted in accordance with the above determination, and the cause is remanded for resentencing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw