CAPITAL SUNBELT INVESTMENTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD G. OBERLIN, JAMES B. LOCKE, WILLIAM J. HINTON, ROGER A. SCHUBEL, ALLEN W. MCCORMICK, PATRICIA A. TOWNSEL, DALE S. BOURDETTE AND DARRELL EUGENE HESS, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record in this case and the arguments of the parties, we conclude that the trial judge properly granted the equitable relief which he found appropriate after the nonjury trial. Since all of the limited partners and the general partner of the limited partnership were parties to the suit, the trial judge had jurisdiction to grant the relief contained in the final judgment. Under such circumstances, the final judgment was properly entered even though the limited partnership itself was not a party. We view the trial judge’s declaration that the limited partnership is nonexistent to be unnecessary for the implementation of the remedies contained in the final judgment.
Accordingly, we affirm.
DANAHY, C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City Nat'l Bank OF Fla. v. Dade Cnty., 715 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…ence. See Jacksonville Transp. Auth. v. ASC Assocs., 559 So. 2d 330, 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (cautioning that conceptual plans and speculative future uses are to be excluded from evidence at trial); cf. Circle K General, Inc. v. Hillsborough County, 524 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (“As . the site plan approval remained subject to county permitting requirements, ... [t]he mere approval of the site plan was not a guarantee that the county would issue a driveway permit, and appellant could not have reasonably…