JEFFREY A. NADEL AND RONALD B. NADEL, APPELLANTS,
v.
ESTHER GROSS AND BENJAMIN GROSS, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1988-05-03
No. 87-2989
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
523 So. 2d 1279 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1280] PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Count I of the complaint alleging fraud on the part of appellees. We find that count properly tracked the elements of fraudulent conduct in setting out the claim and stated facts with sufficient specificity. Peninsular Fla. Dist. Council of Assemblies of God v. Pan Am. Inv., 450 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We affirm the dismissal of Counts II and III for failure to state a cause of action. Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So. 2d 482 (Fla.1956); First Church of Christ Scientist v. City of St. Petersburg, 344 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw