JOSE A. ROJAS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conspiracy To Traffic In Cannabis cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Finding no merit in appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish his participation in a conspiracy, that the trial court erred in admitting audio tapes into evidence, and that error appeared in the admission of evidence of other crimes, we affirm his convictions of attempt to traffic in cannabis and conspiracy to traffic in cannabis. See United States v. Martin, 794 F. 2d 1531 (11th Cir.1986); Munroe v. State, 514 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So. 2d 987 (Fla.1988); State v. Morales, 460 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The state concedes that appellant’s attempted trafficking conviction, incorrectly cited as a first degree felony, should be corrected to appear as a second degree felony. We remand for that purpose.
Affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Date v. State, 528 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…adjudication as a first-degree misdemeanant, § 777.04(4)(d), Fla.Stat. (1987), rather than as a third-degree felon. The remainder of the defendant’s contentions have been answered adversely to him in the appeal of a codefendant, see Rojas v. State, 523 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). As modified, defendant’s convictions are affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Munroe v. State, 514 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- State v. Raphael Morales, 460 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- United States v. Martin, 794 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir. 1986)