ANTONIO GOLPHIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTONIO GOLPHIN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
522 So. 2d 1043
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief because the motion makes no attempt to comply with the time requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850; nor does it contain an explanation justifying the untimely filing as required by the rule.
ANSTEAD, LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Blaine Elkins v. State, 555 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…t upon which it could be inferred that the facts or the legal basis upon which the claim was predicated were unknown to the defendant. See Demps v. State, 515 So. 2d 196 (Fla.1987); Paez v. State, 512 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Golphin v. State, 522 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Grooms v. State, 522 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). 5. The Court also finds that the present motion should be denied, because it is a successive motion which raises claims that were obviously known to the defendant at the time…
-
Pilkington PLC v. Metro Corp., 526 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…r; Harless v. Kuhn, 403 So. 2d 423 (Fla.1981); see Wallraff v. T.G.I. Friday’s, Inc., 490 So. 2d 50 (Fla.1986) (failure to attend deposition does not warrant dismissal absent finding of willfulness or bad faith); Maxwell v. Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc., 522 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (vague, jumbled, and incomplete responses to discovery requests do not justify dismissal, where appellant made a good faith effort to comply with discovery orders); Morales v. Four Star Poultry & Provision Co., 523 So. 2d 1183 (F…