RANDALL MATHENA, WARDEN, PETITIONER,
v.
LEE BOYD MALVO.

U.S. | 2019-03-18
No. 18–217.
139 S. Ct. 1317 Supreme Court of the United States (2019) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 203 L. Ed. 2d 563
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Kahler v. Kansas, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)
    …could not "distinguish right from wrong" when committing his crime-or, otherwise put, whether that Clause requires States to adopt the moral-incapacity test from M'Naghten . Pet. for Cert. 18. We granted certiorari, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 1318, 203 L.Ed.2d 563 (2019), and now hold it does not. II A A challenge like Kahler's must surmount a high bar. Under well-settled precedent, a state rule about criminal liability-laying out either the elements of or the defenses to a crime-violates due process only if…
  • Kansas v. Garcia, 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw