JAMAR ALONZO QUARLES, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• Parker Drilling Mgmt. Servs., Ltd. v. Newton, 139 S. Ct. 1881 (U.S. 2019)
  …-hour law because the FLSA saving clause "explicitly permits more protective state wage and hour laws." Id. , at 1097 (citing 29 U.S.C. § 218(a) ). Given the disagreement between the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, we granted certiorari. 586 U. S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 914, 202 L.Ed.2d 641 (2019). II Before the OCSLA, coastal States and the Federal Government disputed who had the right to lease submerged lands on the continental shelf. Some coastal States even asserted jurisdiction all the way to the outer edge of t…
• Jamar Alonzo Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1872 (U.S. 2019)
  …years in prison. The Sixth Circuit affirmed. 850 F. 3d 836, 840 (2017). We granted certiorari in light of a Circuit split on the question of how to assess state remaining-in burglary statutes for purposes of § 924(e). 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 914, 202 L.Ed.2d 640 (2019). II Section 924(e) lists "burglary" as a qualifying predicate offense for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. But § 924(e) does not define "burglary." The question here is how to define "burglary" under § 924(e). We do not write on…
• United States v. Herrold., 139 S. Ct. 2712 (U.S. 2019)