AVERY HIGHSMITH, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1988-01-28
No. 70913
MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur,
522 So. 2d 340 Florida Supreme Court (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
BARKETT, Justice.

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Highsmith v. State, 508 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), affirming petitioner’s convictions and sentences and certifying the same question set out in VanTassell v. State, 498 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), quashed, 512 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 1987), as a question of great public importance. The certified question is:

Does a trial court’s statement, made at the time of departure from the sentencing guidelines, that it would depart for any one of the reasons given, regardless of whether both valid and invalid reasons are found on review, satisfy the standard set forth in Albritton v. State [476 So. 2d 150, (Fla.1985) ]?

512 So. 2d at 182.

We answered the question in the negative in Griffis v. State, 509 So. 2d 1104 (Fla.1987). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand to the district court for review in light of our decision in Grif-fis.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur,


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martin v. State, 523 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …2d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Subsequently, however, in Atwaters v. State, 519 So. 2d 611 (Fla.1988), the supreme court held that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime does not constitute a valid reason for departure. See also Flournoy v. State, 522 So. 2d 340 (Fla.1988), disapproving this court’s en banc opinion reported at 507 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). From our examination of the record, we conclude that on remand, the trial court would impose the same sentence although the fourth reason would no…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw