THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
REMBERT L. LOWERY, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Bar disciplined attorney Rembert L. Lowery for professional negligence in two client matters involving failure to timely file necessary legal documents and failure to return client funds and documents. The Florida Supreme Court approved the referee's findings and imposed a public reprimand as discipline.
Lowery violated Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) of the former Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility by neglecting legal matters in both the guardianship and civil cases, warranting public reprimand as discipline.
[1] Neglecting a legal matter entrusted to an attorney, in violation of Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) of the former Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility, constitut…
[2] An attorney's failure to file a petition for discharge of guardian after the ward's death constitutes neglect of a legal matter.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“respondent negligently represented a client in connection with a guardianship”
Establishes the first count of misconduct involving failure to timely file guardianship discharge petition
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn the first matter, Lowery was retained to establish a guardianship but failed to file a petition for discharge of the guardian after the ward died i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Neglect Of Legal Matter cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the referee’s report filed pursuant to Rule 3-7.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. On the first count, the referee found that respondent negligently represented a client in connection with a guardianship. The respondent, attorney Rembert L. Lowery, was retained to establish a guardianship.
In June 1985, a citation was issued to the guardian ordering him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to file the annual reports and accounting.
In August 1985, the ward died. Respondent failed to file a petition for discharge of guardian.
In May 1986, the court issued an order to the guardian to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to file annual reports. Respondent was served with the show-cause order but took no action.
In August 1986, the guardian was sentenced to sixty days in jail to be served only if the reports were not filed in twenty days. At this point the guardian retained other counsel who filed a petition for discharge of guardian. The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him in violation of Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) of the former Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility.
On the second count of the complaint, the referee found that in 1984 respondent agreed to represent a client in a civil matter and was paid a retainer. The client had received some checks from the adverse parties in connection with an offer of settlement. The client rejected the settlement offer and instructed respondent to return the checks to the opposing parties. Respondent placed the checks in his files and failed to return them.
In May 1986, the client demanded the return of documents due to respondent’s failure to proceed with the case. Although assuring the client in July and October of 1986 and in February 1987 that he would return the file and the retainer, respondent failed to do so until April 1987. At the time of the final hearing before the referee, respondent had not yet refunded the fee. The referee again recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) by neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him.
The referee found that there were mitigating circumstances based on the respondent’s personal and financial difficulties, his cooperation with The Florida Bar’s investigation, and his positive steps to correct the underlying problems that contributed to his neglect of the client’s cases. In view of the mitigating factors and the lack of disciplinary history, the referee recommended that respondent be given a public reprimand.
Neither party seeks review of the referee’s report. We approve the findings and recommendation. We hereby publicly reprimand attorney Rembert L. Lowery for professional misconduct.
The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the respondent. Judgment for costs is entered against Rembert L. Lowery in the amount of $535.76, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Kaplan, 576 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 1991)…e referee found that respondent’s marital problems and loss of his father mitigated the offenses, we agree with The Florida Bar that because of respondent’s disciplinary history, a public reprimand is now in order. See, e.g., The Fla. Bar v. Lowery, 522 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1988); The Fla. Bar v. Harrison, 398 So. 2d 1367 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, it is the judgment of this Court that attorney S. Richard Kaplan is both publicly reprimanded by publication of this opinion in the Southern Reporter and placed on prob…