THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
HAROLD C. CULMER, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1988-03-17
No. 71845
MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, ERHLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
521 So. 2d 1110 Florida Supreme Court (1988)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Bar sought approval of a consent judgment imposing disciplinary sanctions against attorney Harold C. Culmer for misappropriation of client funds. The Florida Supreme Court accepted Culmer's guilty plea and approved the consent judgment, resulting in immediate disbarment with a five-year bar on reapplication and restitution requirements.


Holding

The Court accepted the respondent's guilty plea and approved the consent judgment, imposing immediate disbarment with a five-year bar on reapplication, mandatory restitution to affected clients, an independent audit of trust accounts, cooperation with the Clients' Security Fund, return of unearned fees, and assessment of disciplinary costs.


Headnotes

[1] A consent judgment in a disciplinary proceeding may be approved by the court pursuant to rule 8-7.8(a) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

[2] Disbarment may be imposed as a disciplinary measure in a lawyer disciplinary proceeding.

Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of a guilty plea for consent judgment filed directly with the Court pursuant to rule 8-7.8(a) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.”

Establishes the procedural mechanism by which the disciplinary matter was brought to the Supreme Court

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Respondent Harold C. Culmer, an attorney, misappropriated client funds held in trust accounts. The misappropriation was significant enough to trigger …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of a guilty plea for consent judgment filed directly with the Court pursuant to rule 8-7.8(a) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The Florida Bar seeks approval of the consent judgment.

We accept respondent’s plea and approve the consent judgment, which imposes disciplinary measures expressed as follows:

a) Disbarment wherein Respondent shall not tender an application for admission to The Florida Bar within five (5) years after the date of the Supreme Court Order of disbarment.

b) Prior to tendering an application for readmission, Respondent shall make restitution to any party who has suffered a loss due to misappropriation of funds.

c) In an effort to determine the extent of the misappropriation, within 80 days after approval of this consent judgment by the Board of Governors, Respondent shall retain the services of a certified public accountant (“accountant”) to complete an audit of his trust accounts and other accounts. The accountant shall file with the Supreme Court, with a copy to Paul A. Gross, Bar Counsel, an affidavit reflecting Respondent’s liability to each client or party including the name of said party and the amount of funds owed.

d) Respondent shall cooperate with any investigation by the Clients’ Security Fund and shall reimburse the Clients’ Security Fund for any claims paid as a result of his actions. Reimbursement to the Clients’ Security Fund shall be made prior to tendering an application for readmission to the Bar. e) Respondent shall return to clients the unearned portion of any fee. Respondent shall attempt to amicably resolve any dispute with a client involving his fee and agrees that with the client’s approval any dispute involving his fee shall be submitted to arbitration before the Fee Arbitration Committee of the Dade County Bar Association.

f) Taxation of costs of this disciplinary proceeding assessed against Respondent, with execution to issue with interest at a rate of 12% to accrue on all costs not paid within thirty (30) days of entry of the Supreme Court's final order, unless the time for payment is extended by the Board of Governors. The costs in this matter are One Hundred Fifty ($160.00) Dollars for Administrative Costs (Rule 3-7.5(K)(l), Rules of Discipline.

We hereby adopt the consent judgment as the judgment of this Court, disbar Harold C. Culmer, effective immediately, and order that he comply with the foregoing terms of the consent judgment.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, ERHLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw