JOSE PASTOR, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court held that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime cannot be used as a proper basis for departing upward from sentencing guidelines, as doing so would impermissibly duplicate the statutory offense levels already determined by drug quantity and invade the legislature's province in setting sentencing ranges.
No. The quantity of drugs may not be utilized as a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines because the legislature has already used drug quantity to define the offense and establish mandatory minimum sentences, and allowing quantity to support departure would impermissibly duplicate this legislative determination and invade the legislature's province in establishing sentencing ranges.
[1] The quantity of drugs involved in a crime may not be utilized as a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines.
[2] Using the quantity of drugs to determine the offense for which a defendant may be convicted and then basing a sentence departure on that same quantity is duplicitous.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the quantity of drugs involved in a crime may not be utilized as a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines.”
The Court's holding directly answering the certified question and establishing the controlling legal standard.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJose Pastor was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and possessed over 3,000 grams of cocaine, which is approximately 7 times the 400-gram threshold r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentence Review cases and more on FLexlaw
KOGAN, Justice.
Jose Pastor petitions this Court to review his sentence for trafficking in cocaine. The Fourth District Court of Appeal, Pastor v. State, 498 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), certified to this Court the following question of great public importance:
May the quantity of drugs involved in a crime be a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines?
Id. at 965. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Because of our recent decision in Atwaters v. State, 519 So. 2d 611 (Fla.1988), we answer the certified question in the negative and quash the decision of the district court.
Pastor was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and sentenced to 30 years imprisonment, a departure over the 15 year mandatory minimum sentence specified in the sentencing guidelines. The trial court gave the following reasons for departure:
a.The defendant traveled under a false name.
b. The defendant admitted to the police that he was a middleman drug dealer. c. The defendant possessed approximately 7 times more than the amount of cocaine required for a 15 year mandatory minimum sentence. Specifically, the defendant possessed over 3,000 grams of cocaine (3 kilograms). A 15 year mandatory minimum sentence requires at least 400 grams.
498 So. 2d at 964. The district court correctly invalidated the first two reasons for departure, upheld the remaining reason regarding the amount of cocaine Pastor possessed, but reversed the sentence because there was insufficient evidence on the record to support that reason. On motion for rehearing, the district court certified the question stated above for this Court’s consideration.
In Atwaters v. State, supra, we held that “the quantity of drugs involved in a crime may not be utilized as a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines.” 519 So. 2d at 612. We reasoned that because the legislature used the quantity of drugs to determine the offense for which a defendant may be convicted based on that quantity, it would be duplicitous to further base a sentence on that quantity. Moreover, to do so improperly “invades the province of the legislature which promulgated the statutory ranges for the quantity of proscribed substances involved in an offense.” Banks v. State, 509 So. 2d 1320, 1321 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (footnote omitted). As in Atwaters, we find this reasoning persuasive.
Accordingly we answer the certified question in the negative, quash that portion of the district court’s opinion dealing with quantity of narcotics as a reason for sentence departure, approve the remainder of the opinion, and remand this case for resentencing consistent with this opinion.*
It is so ordered. MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT and GRIMES, JJ., concur. *
Pastor, in his brief, raises issues concerning the suppression of evidence, the denial of a motion for continuance, and improper prosecutorial comment. We believe that the district court adequately addressed these issues on appeal, and, accordingly, we decline to review that decision beyond the scope of the certified question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D'Angelo v. State, 541 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…ed upon appellant’s motion therefor and has not been shown to be the result of prosecu-torial misconduct. The departure sentence imposed was based upon three grounds, two of which were invalid, ie., the quantity of drugs involved, Pastor v. State, 521 So. 2d 1079 (Fla.1988), and the effect of the distribution of large amounts of drugs on society, Platt v. State, 515 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The third ground, that the crime was committed in a well organized and professional manner, is a valid reason f…
-
United States v. Knights, 989 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2021)…zone of constitutional action . . . ." Id. In fact, some officers already issue pre-questioning warnings to citizens they encounter on the street. See, e.g., Pastor v. State, 498 So. 2d 962, 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986), quashed on other grounds, 521 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1988); cf. United States v. Czichray, 378 F.3d 822, 825 (8th Cir. 2004); Carbado, (E)racing, supra, at 1029 (noting that "federal agents were already in the practice of giving . . . warnings" before conducting consent searches) (internal quota…
Authorities Cited
- Atwaters v. State, 519 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1988)
- Pastor v. State, 498 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Michael Banks v. State, 509 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)