CARLTON J. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hapney v. Cent. Garage, Inc., 579 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …a valid non-competition agreement. Id. “When a contract is clear and unambiguous, the court cannot give it the meaning other than that expressed in it, and cannot rewrite the contract for the parties.” Florida Pest Control & Chemical Co. v. Thomas, 520 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). 551 So. 2d at 506. In fact, the majority opinion effectively revokes the presumption of irreparable injury to the employer at a hearing on a temporary injunction, which is recognized in the above quotation as well as in Capra-…
• Xerographics, Inc. v. Thomas, 537 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …e a valid noncompetition agreement. Id. “When a contract is clear and unambiguous, the court cannot give it the meaning other than that expressed in it, and cannot rewrite the contract for the parties.” Florida Pest Control & Chemical Co. v. Thomas, 520 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). If the trial court finds the provisions of a noncompetition agreement unreasonable, the court should modify the agreement and award an appropriate remedy. Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So. 2d 11 (Fla.1974). The fact that…
• Sarasota Bev. Co. v. Johnson, 551 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …application, in my opinion, that discretion has been eliminated. See Dad’s Properties, Inc. v. Lucas, 545 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Xerographies, Inc. v. Thomas, 537 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Florida Pest Control & Chemical Co. v. Thomas, 520 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Twenty Four Collection, Inc. v. Keller, 389 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 419 So. 2d 1048 (Fla.1982). The key to that conclusion rests in another conclusion, that the presumption of irreparable harm in such nonco…

  ← 1 / 3 →