IN RE WILNA T. BASKIN, AN ALLEGED INCOMPETENT; H.H. BASKIN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
WILNA B. SHERBURNE, CYNTHIA B. LYON AND WILLIAM H. SHERBURNE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's determination of incompetency cannot relate back to the date of psychiatric evaluation; incompetency begins upon the filing of the judgment.
[1] A person adjudicated mentally incompetent is presumed incapable of managing their affairs or entering binding agreements from the moment the judgment of incompetency is f…
[2] A trial court's determination of incompetency cannot relate back to the date of a psychiatric evaluation prior to the filing of the judgment.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA competency proceeding was initiated under section 744.331, Florida Statutes. The trial court found the individual incompetent and determined this in…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Guardianship Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Judge.
The record in this matter, stemming from a competency/guardianship proceeding conducted pursuant to section 744.331, Florida Statutes (1986), reveals an intra-fa-milial conflict spawning the question of whether a trial court’s determination of incompetency may relate back to the moment when the psychiatric evaluation was undertaken. The pertinent statute provides as follows:
After a judgment adjudicating a person to be mentally or physically incompetent is filed, the person shall, for the duration of the incompetency, be presumed to be incapable of managing his own affairs or of making any gift, contract, or instrument in writing that is binding on him or his estate. The filing of the judgment shall be notice of the incapacity.
§ 744.331(8), Fla.Stat. (1986).
Our research fails to disclose any judicial construction of the foregoing language. Thus, we accord it the meaning we deem compatible with its purpose and vacate only that aspect of the trial court’s October 21, 1986, order finding that Wilna T. Baskin “has been incompetent since April 21-22, 1986, the dates of the initial examination by the court appointed psychiatrists....” It is evident that to construe the statute as permitting a retrospective determination of incompetency would extend the statutory presumption beyond its intended range and expose those who have dealt with the incompetent prior to entry of the judgment to the risk of loss. In short, incapacity due to incompetence does not occur, as the statute states, until the judgment is filed.
In vacating a portion of the October 21, 1986, order, we emphasize that we are not placing our approval upon the conduct of any participant which may ultimately be found improper or unethical. Moreover, the resolution we reach in this proceeding is not to be treated as impairing or foreclosing any challenge permitted by law to events which occurred after April 21, 1986.
Accordingly, that aspect of the trial court’s October 21 order, referred to above, is vacated; in all other respects such order is affirmed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re the Est. OF Va. Sutton Salley v. Comprehensive Pers. Care Servs., Inc., 742 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…ct that she signed the declaration some twenty-two days before the court determined she was incapacitated. Gallagher, in turn, points out that a person is presumed competent until an adjudication of incompetence is rendered. See Baskin v. Sherburne, 520 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). The resolution of the question in such finite terms is entirely unnecessary. Even before the 1989 adoption of the legislative policy referred to earlier, section 744.312(3)(a) of the Florida Guardianship Law required the court t…