DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, APPELLANT,
v.
LAURIAN ANNE RAUEN SPANKIE, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
In this case the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, during the course of a dependency proceeding, entered into an agreement with the mother to pay for a psychological evaluation, provided the evaluation was performed by one of four departmentally approved psychologists. Over the objection of HRS, the trial court, without hearing, authorized the evaluation to be performed by Mr. Denton Kurtz, who held a master’s degree in education and who was not included in the agreement. Since the basis for HRS’s obligation to pay was that the psychologist be selected from a list of four approved psychologists, the order requiring HRS to pay the counseling fee of Mr. Denton Kurtz is
REVERSED.
SHARP, C.J., and COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Runner O. Santana v. Henry, 12 So. 3d 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…la. 1st DCA 1993) (alleged misclassification); Van Poyck v. Dugger, 579 So. 2d 346, 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (alleged poor ventilation), or gain-time calculations not affecting DOC’s current right [*846] to hold the petitioner, see Williams v. State, 519 So. 2d 723, 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So. 2d 25, 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), or anything less than a state prisoner’s alleged right to immediate release from custody. “The writ of habeas corpus is a high prerogative writ of ancient origin…
-
Vallejo v. State, 545 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…he appellant, Pedro Luis Vallejo appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition does not allege, nor does the record show that the relief requested would entitle the appellant to immediate release. See, Williams v. State, 519 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Netherly v. Dugger, 513 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) and Brown v. Wainwright, 498 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Therefore, the trial court’s denial of the writ is AFFIRMED. SHARP, C.J., and DANIEL, J., concur.…
-
Hamby v. State, 619 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…the petition. Habeas corpus relief is not available as a remedy to contest loss of gain time unless an inmate is being unlawfully detained and is entitled to an immediate release. See Thomas v. Dugger, 548 So. 2d 230 (Fla.1989); Williams v. State, 519 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). If Hamby has exhausted his administrative remedies, he may be entitled to seek a writ of mandamus in the circuit court to compel lawful application of gain time rules. See, e.g., Crain v. State, 579 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence