PIERRE E. DAWSON, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2017-12-04
No. 17–6597.
138 S. Ct. 529 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 L. Ed. 2d 405
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, 889 F.3d 1239 (11th Cir. 2018)
    …d. III. We review the District Court's exclusion of lay opinion testimony pursuant to the Federal Rules of Evidence for abuse of discretion. United States v. Jeri , 869 F. 3d 1247, 1259 (11th Cir. 2017), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 529, 199 L.Ed.2d 405 (2017). Lay opinion testimony must be "(a) rationally based on the witness's perception; (b) helpful to clearly understanding the witness's testimony or to determining a fact in issue; and (c) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw