ROTHE DEVELOPMENT, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ET AL.

U.S. | 2017-10-16
No. 16–1239.
138 S. Ct. 354 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 L. Ed. 2d 261
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Currier v. Virginia., 138 S. Ct. 2144 (U.S. 2018)
  • United States v. Microsoft Corp., 138 S. Ct. 1186 (U.S. 2018)
    …nment has obtained a warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 2703, a U.S. provider of e-mail services must disclose to the Government electronic communications within its control even if the provider stores the communications abroad. 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 356, 199 L.Ed.2d 261 (2017). In December 2013, federal law enforcement agents applied to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for a § 2703 warrant requiring Microsoft to disclose all e-mails and other information associated with the ac…
  • Ohio v. Am. Express Co., 138 S. Ct. 2274 (U.S. 2018)
    …., at 196-200. Evaluating the credit-card market as a whole, the Second Circuit concluded that Amex's antisteering provisions were not anticompetitive and did not violate § 1. See id., at 200-206. We granted certiorari, 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 355, 199 L.Ed.2d 261 (2017), and now affirm. II Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States." 15 U.S.C. § 1. This Court has long recogn…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw