MICHAEL FITZGERALD LEE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL FITZGERALD LEE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
518 So. 2d 963
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court, and, pursuant to our directions, a de novo hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress was conducted. See Lee v. State, 499 So. 2d 66 (Fla.3d DCA 1987). The trial court again denied the motion to suppress, and we affirm. Roman v. State, 475 So. 2d 1228 (Fla.1985); Kee v. State, 504 So. 2d 1365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 403 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); James v. State, 223 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Roman v. State, 475 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1985)
- James v. State, 223 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
- Williams v. State, 403 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- LEE v. State, 499 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Velazquez v. Alavar Gaitan, M.D., 499 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- KEE v. State, 504 So. 2d 1365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)