THE BEHRENS COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
B.D. RAWLS, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-12-29
No. 87-2363
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
518 So. 2d 945 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not err in granting the appellee’s motion for dissolution pursuant to section 607.274(l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1985), because the evidence clearly indicates that the shareholders are hopelessly deadlocked at present and have been so for a number of years. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fernandez v. Basil Yates, M.D., 145 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
    …without agreement of the parties, the capital infusion needed to improve its occupancy rate could not occur, guaranteeing its continued decline. This record, we believe was sufficient to support dissolution of Dabama. See Behrens Co., Inc. v. Rawls, 518 So. 2d 945, 945-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“The trial court did not- err in granting the appellee’s motion for dissolution pursuant to section 607.274(l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1985) [precursor to section 607.1430], because the evidence clearly indicates that th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw