TIMOTHY IVORY CARPENTER, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2017-06-05
No. 16–402.
137 S. Ct. 2211 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 198 L. Ed. 2d 657
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Baskin v. State, 255 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
  • Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (U.S. 2018)
    …concluded that the resulting business records are not entitled to Fourth Amendment protection. Id., at 888 (quoting Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 741, 99 S.Ct. 2577, 61 L.Ed.2d 220 (1979) ). We granted certiorari. 582 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2211, 198 L.Ed.2d 657 (2017). II A The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." The "basic purpose of this Amendment," our cases have recognized, "is to…
  • North Carolina v. Covington, 138 S. Ct. 2548 (U.S. 2018)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw