GARY DINGLE AND JONATHAN BAPTISTE, APPELLANTS,
v.
FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
GARY DINGLE AND JONATHAN BAPTISTE, APPELLANTS,
FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
516 So. 2d 100
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. §§ 627.728(3)(c), 627.848(4), Fla.Stat. (1985).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anthony v. Schmitt, 557 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)…1989), review dismissed, 554 So. 2d 1167 (Fla.1989) (notice of taking deposition); Ferguson v. Carter, 520 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 529 So. 2d 693 (Fla.1988) (issuance of subpoena for production of documents); de Richemont v. Osias, 516 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (two interrogatories); Liuzzo v. Crapo, 504 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (request for production); Hunter v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., 477 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So. 2d 67 (Fla.1986) (notice to produce)…1 / 2
-
Rosa v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 636 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…the jury. See 75 Am.Jur.2d Trial § 93. As such, it helps to shorten trial, simplify issues and reduce the possibility of mistrial, 75 Am.Jur.2d Trial § 94, and thereby moves the case toward a conclusion on the merits. See also de Richemont v. Osias, 516 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (Letts, J., dissenting) (motion for protective order directed to interrogatories was sufficient meaningful activity to preclude dismissal for failure to prosecute). In addition, because the trial court had previously ordered that…