LUIS FERNANDO ESTELA-GOMEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
LUIS FERNANDO ESTELA-GOMEZ, PETITIONER,
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
137 S. Ct. 386
Supreme Court of the United States (2016)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 196 L. Ed. 2d 305
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Presendieu, 880 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2018)…s Court has recognized, “[t]his [§ 2B1.6] limitation is particularly relevant to § 2B1.1 because ‘means of identification’ may include access devices.” United States v. Taylor, 818 F. 3d 671, 675 (11th Cir.), cert denied, - U.S. -, 137 S. Ct. 387, 196 L.Ed.2d 305 (2016) (mem.). The § 2B1.6 limitation is intended to prevent a defendant who is separately convicted of aggravated identity theft from being “doubly penalized” for the same conduct. Id. Notwithstanding the § 2B1.6 limitation, a defendant who is s…1 / 2
-
United States v. Keyiona Marvette Wright, 862 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2017)…§ 1029(e)(1) includes credit cards, debit cards, usernames and passwords, routing and bank account numbers, and merchant account numbers. United States v. Taylor, 818 F. 3d 671, 680 (11th Cir.) (credit cards), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 387, 196 L.Ed.2d 305 (2016); United States v. Klopf, 423 F. 3d 1228, 1240 (11th Cir. 2005) (credit cards); United States v. Baldwin, 774 F. 3d 711, 722 (11th Cir. 2014) (debit cards); United States v. Barrington, 648 F. 3d 1178, 1202 (11th Cir. 2011) (usernames and pass…