SKYLAKE REALTY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, CARL RITTER, JUNE RITTER AND TRACEY RITTER, APPELLANTS,
v.
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND DADE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
SKYLAKE REALTY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, CARL RITTER, JUNE RITTER AND TRACEY RITTER, APPELLANTS,
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AND DADE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
515 So. 2d 353
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Babcock v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 501 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Neida’s Boutique, Inc. v. Gabor & Co., 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert, denied, 366 So. 2d 883 (Fla.1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Univ. OF Miami v. Wilson, 948 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…times similarly unchaste. See, e.g., Dozier v. Wild, 659 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)("We grant rehearing [en banc] to correct the statement of facts and therefore substitute the following for our original opinion.''); Slemp v. City of N. Miami, 515 So. 2d 353, 354 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987)(permitting en banc review to consider an alternative argument raised by appellee for affirmance). Nevertheless, cases such as this should provide a reminder to litigants that motions for rehearing en banc should be submitted…
-
Fletcher Slemp and Dora Slemp v. City OF N. Miami, 545 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 1989)…ail to remove what nature put there. Since there is no indication that, if the city had done nothing at all, the Slemps would have been in any different position, ... there was no breach of a legally cognizable “duty.” Slemp v. City of North Miami, 515 So. 2d 353, 356-57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (Schwartz, J., concurring) (citations omitted). GRIMES, J., concurs.…1 / 3
Authorities Cited
- S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Fasce, 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Neida's Boutique, Inc. v. Gabor & Co., 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Babcock v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 501 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)