MARVIN CANNON, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA.
MARVIN CANNON, PETITIONER,
FLORIDA.
136 S. Ct. 2389
Supreme Court of the United States (2016)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 195 L. Ed. 2d 764
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tundidor v. State, 221 So. 3d 587 (Fla. 2017)…son v. State, 2 So. 3d 146, 158 (Fla. 2009). “However, the question of whether a statement is hearsay is a matter of law and is subject to de novo review on appeal.” Cannon v. State, 180 So. 3d 1023, 1037 (Fla. 2015), cert. den [*599] ied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 2389, 195 L.Ed.2d 764 (2016). If a declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning the out-of-court statement, then the statement is not hearsay if that statement is “[cjonsistent with the declarant’s testimony and is offered…