THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
GEORGE F. HERO, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1987-10-15
No. 70775
MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
513 So. 2d 1053 Florida Supreme Court (1987)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Bar disciplined attorney George F. Hero for violations of trust account rules, including commingling client funds with personal funds, failing to maintain proper records, and failing to promptly distribute client funds. The Florida Supreme Court accepted Hero's guilty plea and consent judgment, imposing a public reprimand, two-year probation with quarterly CPA reporting requirements, and assessment of audit and disciplinary costs.


Holding

The court accepted Hero's guilty plea and consent judgment, imposing a public reprimand to be published in the Southern Reporter, two-year probation requiring quarterly CPA reports certifying trust account compliance, and assessment of audit and disciplinary costs of $3,308.27 against Hero.


Headnotes

[1] A lawyer's failure to comply with rules governing trust accounts, including commingling funds, failing to maintain proper records, and improper use of trust funds, consti…

[2] A negative balance in a lawyer's trust account, even if no checks are dishonored, can indicate improper maintenance of the account.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“respondent admitted his failure to comply with the applicable rules governing trust accounts. These violations included commingling his own funds with funds entrusted to him by clients; failing to maintain proper records reflecting the date, source, and reason for all receipts and disbursements of trust funds; failure to make monthly trust account reconciliations; improper use of trust fund moneys; and failure to promptly pay or deliver to a client funds which the client is entitled to receive.”

Establishes the specific trust account violations admitted by the respondent

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Hero, a sole practitioner with a part-time secretary, violated multiple trust account rules by commingling his personal funds with client trust funds,…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the guilty plea and consent judgment submitted by respondent, George F. Hero, with the approval of The Florida Bar. In his plea, respondent admitted his failure to comply with the applicable rules governing trust accounts. These violations included commingling his own funds with funds entrusted to him by clients; failing to maintain proper records reflecting the date, source, and reason for all receipts and disbursements of trust funds; failure to make monthly trust account reconciliations; improper use of trust fund moneys; and failure to promptly pay or deliver to a client funds which the client is entitled to receive.

As a result of the above violations, respondent’s trust account was improperly maintained and partial distribution of trust account funds left a negative balance on deposit. Although none of respondent’s trust account checks were dishonored, if checks had been issued to cover all of respondent’s trust account obligations, some checks would have been dishonored.

Respondent submitted the following factors in mitigation: (a) respondent is a sole practitioner and has a part-time secretary; (b) respondent fully cooperated with The Florida Bar’s investigation audit, including furnishing all bank records without the issuance of a subpoena; (c) following The Florida Bar’s audit, respondent initiated action to correct the deficiencies in his trust accounting procedures and now follows the required procedures; (d) respondent has no record of any prior disciplinary action; and (e) respondent derived no personal benefit from his actions in connection with advancing funds.

We agree with the following disciplinary measures: (a) public reprimand to be published in the Southern Reporter upon entry of the final order of discipline by the Supreme Court of Florida; (b) two years’ probation during which time respondent is required to submit quarterly reports from a certified public accountant reflecting that his trust account is being maintained in compliance with former rule 11.02(4)(C) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar; (c) taxation of costs of the audit and these disciplinary proceedings assessed against respondent, with execution to issue with interest at a rate of twelve per cent to accrue on all costs not paid within thirty days of entry of the Supreme Court’s final order unless the time for payment is extended by the Board of Governors. We accept the guilty plea and approve the consent judgment on discipline. We hereby reprimand respondent George F. Hero and place him on probation for two years under the above-stated conditions. The costs of this proceeding and audit are assessed against respondent. Judgment is entered against George F. Hero for $3,308.27, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw