KELLY EDWARD WADFORD, JR., PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Griffin, 823 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …]he the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule of constitutional law in Descamps. Rather, it clarified- — as a matter of statutory interpretation — application of the ACCA in light of existing precedent.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 256, 193 L.Ed.2d 212 (2015); In re Jackson, 776 F. 3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 2015) (“Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to cases on collate…
• Mays v. United States, 817 F.3d 728 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …that the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule of constitutional law in Descamps. Rather, it clarified — as a matter of statutory interpretation — application of the ACCA in light of existing precedent.”), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 136 S.Ct. 256, 193 L.Ed.2d 212 (2015); United States v. Davis, 751 F. 3d 769, 775 (6th Cir.2014) (“The Supreme Court in Descamps explained that it was not announcing a new rule, but was simply reaffirming” an existing approach.). Given Descamps did not announce a new rule, it a…
• United States v. Monzo, 852 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2017)
  …im. P. 52. An error is harmless if it “had no substantial influence on the outcome and sufficient evidence uninfected by error supports the decision.” Rivers v. United States, 777 F. 3d 1306, 1316 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 267, 193 L.Ed.2d 212 (2015) (alterations and quotation omitted); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a) (defining “harmless error” as “[a]ny error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights”). An error is not harmless if “there is a reasonable…