DOMINGA GHIRA, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF DOMINICO GHIRA, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
BUTLER D. FOSTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
DOMINGA GHIRA, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF DOMINICO GHIRA, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
BUTLER D. FOSTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
46 Fla. 196
Florida Supreme Court (1903)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*197] Per Curiam.
This cause came on-to be finally heard upon the transcript and abstracts of the record, and it appearing that the writ of error therein was issued on a day in the June term, 1898, of this court, to-wit: on June 16th, 1898, and was made returnable to a day within said June term, to-wit: January 9th, 1899, in violation of law and is, therefore, void, it is, therefore, considered by the court that said cause be and the same is stricken from the dockets of this court. Bishop v. Lyons, 43 Fla. 445, 31 South. Rep. 350.
Shackleford, J., being disqualified, took no part in this decision.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gadsden v. State, 76 Fla. 543 (Fla. 1918)…f Ates v. Langley, 61 Fla. 504, 54 South. Rep. 264; Robinson Imp. Co. v. Jackson, 55 Fla. 657, 45 South. Rep. 987; Parker v. Evening News Pub. Co., 54 Fla. 482, 44 South. Rep. 718; Barnett v. Hickson, 48 Fla. 68, 37 South. Rep. 210; Ghira v. Foster, 46 Fla. 196, 35 South. Rep. 876; Savannah, F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Justice, 41 Fla. 508, 26 South. Rep. 704; Payne v. Roche, 41 Fla. 478, 27 South. Rep. 29; Simmons v. State, 40 Fla. 467, 25 South. Rep. 62; Browning v. State, 40 Fla. 466, 25 South. [*545] Rep. 62; S…
Authorities Cited
- Bishop v. I. L. Lyons & Co., 43 Fla. 445 (Fla. 1901)