RYAN HAWTHORNE, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2015-06-08
No. 14–9579.
135 S. Ct. 2819 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 192 L. Ed. 2d 858
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Puentes, 803 F.3d 597 (11th Cir. 2015)
    …hange for the defendant’s substantial assistance under Rule 35(b). ‘We review de novo the scope of the legal authority of the district court to reduce a sentence.” United States v. Green, 764 F. 3d 1352, 1355 (11th Cir.2014), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2819, 192 L.Ed.2d 858 (2015). The law is clear that the district court has no inherent authority to modify a sentence; it may do so only when authorized by a statute or rule. United States v. Diaz-Clark, 292 F. 3d 1310, 1319 (11th Cir.2002). We hold tha…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw