THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
DENNIS R. DINGLE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Dennis Dingle, a Florida Bar member facing disciplinary proceedings for unprofessional conduct, courtroom misconduct, client neglect, and potential conflicts of interest, petitioned to resign from the Bar with leave to apply for readmission after five years. The Florida Supreme Court granted the petition and required Dingle to pay $299.46 in grievance committee costs as a condition of future readmission.
The court granted Dingle's petition to resign from The Florida Bar with leave to apply for readmission after five years from the date of the order, with resignation effective thirty days from the order. As a condition precedent to filing an application for readmission, Dingle must pay grievance committee costs of $299.46, but no referee-level administrative costs or other grievance committee administrative costs from the other pending cases may be imposed.
[1] A member of The Florida Bar against whom disciplinary proceedings are pending may petition to resign with leave to apply for readmission.
[2] A petition for leave to resign from The Florida Bar is governed by rule 3-7.11 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“This matter is governed by rule 3-7.11 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.”
Establishes the procedural rule governing the petition to resign with leave to apply for readmission
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDingle was a member of The Florida Bar against whom disciplinary proceedings were pending. The Florida Bar charged him with unprofessional conduct in …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Resignation From The Florida Bar cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of a petition for leave to resign from The Florida Bar. Respondent Dennis R. Dingle, a member of The Florida Bar against whom disciplinary proceedings are pending, seeks to resign with leave to apply for readmission upon the expiration of five years. This matter is governed by rule 3-7.11 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. In The Florida Bar v. Dingle, No. 69,-010, now pending on complaint of The Florida Bar, the Bar charged respondent with unprofessional conduct in the courtroom. In two cases pending before grievance committees, respondent is charged with (1) neglecting a client’s business and (2) involvement in a situation indicating possible failure to avoid a conflict of interest or breach of fiduciary duty. The progress of these proceedings has been stayed pending our consideration of the petition for leave to resign.
The Florida Bar does not oppose the petition for leave to resign.
We find that the requirements of rule 3-7.11 are satisfied and therefore grant the petition. Dennis R. Dingle is permitted to resign from The Florida Bar with leave to apply for readmission after the expiration of five years from the date of this order. To allow for an orderly winding up of respondent’s practice, his resignation shall be effective thirty days from the date of this order. The Bar asks that we tax the costs of the pending proceedings against the respondent.
The record reflects that after the finding of probable cause and the filing of the complaint, the only further record activity was the appointment of a referee; there was no trial, no referee’s report; and, in two other pending cases, the respondent waived the grievance committee’s finding of probable cause, obviating the need for grievance committee proceedings. Under these circumstances, we find that no referee-level administrative costs can be imposed in case No. 69,010, nor may grievance committee administrative costs be imposed in the other two pending cases. The only costs properly taxable against the respondent are the grievance committee costs in case No. 69,010, including the standard administrative costs assessment of $150.
Accordingly, we hold that as a condition precedent to the filing of an application for readmission, respondent must pay costs in the amount of $299.46.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.