MIGUEL MONJARAZ SALAS, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES; MELBIN RUBEN MIGUEL ALCANTARA MEJIA, AKA MELBIN RUBEN ALCANTARA, PETITIONER, V. UNITED STATES; HILARIO TORRES-HERNANDEZ, PETITIONER, V. UNITED STATES; JOSE MARIO CASTRO-NAJERA, AKA JOSE MARIO CASTRO NAJERA, AKA JOSE MARIO CASTRO, AKA MARIO CASTRO-NAJERA, PETITIONER, V. UNITED STATES; ELMER BANEGAS-ARIAS, PETITIONER, V. UNITED STATES; AND GILBERTO OMAR GASPAR, AKA GILBERTO GASPAR-GUTIERREZ, AKA OMAR GASPAR-GILBERTO, AKA GILBERTO OMAR GASPAR-GUETIERREZ, AKA GILBERTO OMAR GASPAR-GUTIERREZ, PETITIONER, V. UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2015-05-04
No. 14–8223.
135 S. Ct. 2051 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 191 L. Ed. 2d 960
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jordan v. State, 176 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2015)
    …rror include whether the statement was repeated and whether the jury was provided with an accurate statement-of the. law after the improper comment was made.”. See Poole v. State, 151 So. 3d 402, 415 (Fla.2014), cert. denied, — U.S.-,135 S.Ct. 2052, 191 L.Ed.2d 960 (2015). Specifically, Jordan challenges the following statement in the prosecutor’s rebuttal closing argument: You can find him guilty of first-degree murder or guilty of such lesser-ineluded charges. That’s second degree, third degree, manslaught…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw