RICHARD PAUL RIGGINS, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

U.S. | 2015-01-20
No. 14–7110.
135 S. Ct. 1171 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 190 L. Ed. 2d 909
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Evanto v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 814 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2016)
    …1996); Iroanyah v. Bank of Am., 753 F. 3d 686, 688-89 (7th Cir.2014); Vincent v. The Money Store, 736 F. 3d 88, 92 (2d Cir.2013); Keiran v. Home Capital, Inc., 720 F. 3d 721, 724-25 (8th Cir.2013), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1152, 190 L.Ed.2d 909 (2015). Evanto advances policy reasons for extending the canse of action against assignees to include violations of section 1639g, but this argument fails. “It is a well-established principle of statutory construction that ‘when legislation express…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw