DONNIE DICKERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right To Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
WIGGINTON, Judge.
We affirm the trial court’s holding that it had no jurisdiction to consider appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, since the motion was filed during the pendency of appellant’s direct appeal in this Court. Carrin v. State, 459 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Harpham, v. State, 415 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); cf. Bryan v. State, 470 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s presenting the issues raised in a proper Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion.1
JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. . We note that appellant's notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed. However, the trial court failed to include in its order " 'a statement that the movant ha[d] the right to appeal within 30 days of the rendition of the order,’ ” as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Williams v. State, 454 So. 2d 756, 757, n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Therefore, the appeal is correctly treated as one timely filed. Id
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 470 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Williams v. State, 454 So. 2d 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
- Harpham v. State, 415 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Hurst v. State, 415 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Carrin v. State, 459 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)