ONEOK, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

LEARJET, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 135 S. Ct. 2218 (U.S. 2015)
  …preme Court." Id.,at 1071. In light of that determination, it applied a lower level of scrutiny to the Sign Code and concluded that the law did not violate the First Amendment. Id.,at 1073-1076. We granted certiorari, 573 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2900, 189 L.Ed.2d 854 (2014), and now reverse. II A The First Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the enactment of laws "abridging the freedom of speech." U.S. Const., Amdt. 1. Under that Clause, a government, including a muni…
• B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1293 (U.S. 2015)
  …le B & B bore it before the District Court. 716 F. 3d 1020 (2013). Judge Colloton dissented, concluding that issue preclusion should apply. After calling for the views of the Solicitor General, we granted certiorari. 573 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2899, 189 L.Ed.2d 854 (2014). II The first question that we must address is whether an agency decision can ever ground issue preclusion. The District Court rejected issue preclusion because agencies are not Article III courts. The Eighth Circuit did not adopt that view…
• Ala. Dep't OF Revenue v. CSX Transp., Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1136 (U.S. 2015)
  …ax on rail carriers, but not motor carriers. Ibid. We granted certiorari to resolve whether the Eleventh Circuit properly regarded CSX's competitors as an appropriate comparison class for its subsection (b)(4) claim. 573 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2900, 189 L.Ed.2d 854 (2014). We also directed the parties to address whether, when resolving a claim of unlawful tax discrimination, a court should consider aspects of a State's tax scheme apart from the challenged provision. Ibid. II The 4-R Act provides: "(b) The f…