JERRY FLETCHER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court found no error in the judgment and sentence for sexual battery of a child.
Appellant was found guilty of sexual battery of a child by a jury and appeals the judgment and sentence.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sexual Battery On A Child cases and more on FLexlaw
SCHOONOVER, Judge.
Appellant, Jerry Fletcher, appeals a judgment and life sentence entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of sexual battery of a child eleven years of age or younger. After carefully considering the briefs, the record on appeal, and the argument of counsel, we find no error. Two of the points raised on appeal, however, merit discussion.
As one point on appeal, appellant contends that the child victim was incompetent to testify against him. Because the evidence of intelligence, ability to recall, to relate and to appreciate the nature and obligation of an oath is not fully portrayed by a bare record, the decision concerning the competency of a child to testify is one peculiarly within the discretion of the trial judge. Garrard v. State, 335 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 342 So. 2d 1101 (Fla.1977).
Appellant has also raised the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. Although there is some authority for allowing this type of claim to be raised on appeal, generally this issue is more properly raised in a motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In this case, we decline to consider appellant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim because we cannot determine the question from the record before us. Kelley v. State, 486 So. 2d 578 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 107 S.Ct. 244, 93 L.Ed.2d 169 (1986).
Affirmed.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Erickson v. State, 565 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…st-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Kelley v. State, 486 So. 2d 578, 585 (Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871, 107 S.Ct. 244, 93 L.Ed.2d 169 (1986); Cumper v. State, 506 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Fletcher v. State, 506 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The defendant also challenges the use of his in-court identification by the victim at trial, claiming that it is tainted by an impermissibly suggestive pre-trial photographic-identification procedure. He has, however, failed to…
Authorities Cited
- Kelley v. State, 486 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1986)
- Garrard v. State, 335 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)