MADAY FERNANDEZ, A MINOR, ET AL., APPELLANT,
v.
BERKEL, INC., APPELLEE
MADAY FERNANDEZ, A MINOR, ET AL., APPELLANT,
BERKEL, INC., APPELLEE
506 So. 2d 57
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the appellee that the interrogatory jury verdict finding no negligence on the part of the defendant appel-lee, no breach of an implied warranty, and no product defect is supported by competent, substantial evidence. We, accordingly, affirm the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Salnave v. Pub. Health Tr. OF Dade Cnty., 624 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…ry to the manifest weight of the evidence. See Baptist Memorial Hosp., Inc. v. Bell, 384 So. 2d 145 (Fla.1980) (standard for appellate review of denial of motion for new trial is whether trial court abused its discretion); Fernandez v. Berkel, Inc., 506 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Garcia v. Lujando, 253 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) (appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of jury where there is substantial, competent evidence to support finding of fact). We also find that the unobjecte…