PALM SPRINGS GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., AND DR. CARLOS YOUNG-ADAMS, APPELLANTS,
v.
ANGELA VARONA AND ENRIQUE SOTO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF MERCEDES SOTO, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-03-10
Nos. 85-2159, 85-2264, 86-17 and 86-33
Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
504 So. 2d 461 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment entered in favor of appellees in a wrongful death action upon a finding that of the many errors appellants cite as grounds for reversal, those that might justify such a result were not sufficiently preserved for review. See Lusk v. State, 446 So. 2d 1038 (Fla.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873, 105 S.Ct. 229, 83 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984); Ed Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. Green, 468 So. 2d 908 (Fla.1985); Brumage v. Plummer, 502 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Little v. Bankers Nat’l Life Ins. Co., 369 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In addition, we reject appellants’ contention that the amount of the jury verdict was excessive. Bould v. Touchette, 349 So. 2d 1181 (Fla.1977); Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode, 501 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

The remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw