DONNA S. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
IN THE INTEREST OF W.T., A MINOR, APPELLEE
DONNA S. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
IN THE INTEREST OF W.T., A MINOR, APPELLEE
504 So. 2d 66
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends and the appellee agrees that the trial court erred by not advising the appellant of her right to counsel as required by section 39.406, Florida Statutes (1985). We agree, reverse, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.L. v. State, 790 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…n order that A.L. write a letter of apology to the victim. We agree. Since the letter of apology was not in the oral pronouncement, it must be stricken from the written judgment. Murph v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Accordingly, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency but remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a new disposition order that places A.L. on community control for a period of no more than one year and that delete…
-
B.R.W. v. State, 799 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…ourt’s oral pronouncement, we agree that the disposition order must be corrected to reflect that B.R.W. was found guilty of a second-degree misdemeanor for criminal mischief. See Murph v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); § 806.13(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). Additionally, the single disposition order utilized in this case does not separately identify the maximum commitment period imposed on each of the offenses. Because the maximum period of com…